Your Acquisition Signature
I was speaking with a Product Manager at a large tech company today. He’s looking for small, local development teams he can plug into his existing projects/teams. In talking about potential acquisitions, he described what he called the acquisition “signature.”
The term signature is an excellent way to characterize how to think about acquisitions, if you are considering being bought.
While a startup, in its early days, is trying a hundred mini-experiments to see what works and what doesn’t, big companies have multi-year plans they’re executing on. They have annual planning and budgeting sessions that require lengthy preparation, lots of slide decks, and no end of meetings.
One big company exec once said to me, “year end is a terrible time at [his company], the budgeting spreadsheets are flying everywhere!” But the planning, budgeting, and roadmapping exercises also give big company execs excellent visibility into what they want to acquire.
The characteristics of a potential acquisition can be summed up as the “signature.” The signature defines the key characteristics the company is looking to purchase: a team, a technology, or revenue.
Revenue acquisitions are a non-organic way for a big company to increase revenue. The company needs to augment the growth it’s getting through its own marketing and sales efforts. One way to do that is to buy revenue through an acquisition.
Technology acquisitions provide big companies with key intellectual property or technology that they can’t build or that they need to build faster than they are. Perhaps a competitor is beating them on a particular feature and they need that feature fast to stay competitive.
Finally, team acquisitions provide a way to hire a fully built out team without having to recruit the individuals one at a time.
Regardless of which one you are, figure out what signature your buyers are looking for and you’ll have a much easier time making your sale–and getting the price you want.
Leave a comment
Subscribe
Recent Posts
Popular posts
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- March 2006
- December 2005
- October 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004



